Google
 

August 24, 2006

Chairman Prachanda’s warnings

While announcing the renewal of the ceasefire, Chairman Prachanda warned, “We feel it is our duty to clarify here that the government of the seven parties and the so-called parliament, instead of moving forward and standing in favour of the eight-point agreement, are trying to step back on various pretexts. In this context, it has been an issue of a more serious concern that the pressure and signals of foreign power centres are active behind their attitude… It is totally shocking to see that the government of the seven parties is building relationships with the very oppressors of the people’s movement and spreading illusions about the major ally of the movement, the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist).” If the parliamentary parties fail to “awake” from their dream that the peace talks are a sign of the Maoists’ weakness and refuse to abide by “the thrust of the eight-point agreement,” he declared, “We will be obliged to declare a powerful programme of peaceful people’s movement even during the period of the ceasefire.”

 

In a 29 July 2006 interview with the Indian journalist Anand Swaroop Verma (posted on parisar.wordpress.com), Chairman Prachanda explained the party’s present course of action and the assessment it is based on: “We are not taking recourse to this new strategy due to some weakness. In fact, we are trying to move ahead only after gaining strength.

 

“People should understand that we have changed our policy not because of some sort of setback but due to the strength derived from the People’s War. Secondly, we are forced to bring change in our functioning due to the existing balance of forces at the international level. But the first reason is primary. Having gained enough strength any revolutionary party tends to acquire greater flexibility on its way to reaching the seat of power… the flexibility which you see in our tactics is not the result of our deviation but that of strength…

“If we look at the current international balance of forces as also the regional balance of forces in South Asia then it is difficult to reach the centre of power. We will have to take a diversion. That’s why our moving forward after reaching an understanding with the liberal faction of the bourgeoisie is being called a transitionary phase by us. If we look at deeply at the essence of that which we are calling a democratic republic then we would find that it was none other than the people’s republic. I am saying this because within that we have raised the class question, nationality question, gender question and the regional question. If all these four issues are solved then it amounts to having a new democratic republic. Contentwise it is fine but since we are also talking about the peaceful competition with the bourgeoisie, its form looks like a bourgeois democracy whereas it is a New Democracy in essence. That’s why we said that it could be a transitional democracy. We feel that only this way we can fulfil people’s aspiration for a revolution in the current global scenario and can somewhat contribute towards international communist movement and world proletarian revolution…

 


“The people of Nepal will not accept [the current efforts to disarm the People’s Liberation Army]. The people know how important are our weapons for them and that if we are disarmed, it will bring havoc in the country. But their [the parliamentarian parties] class character and selfishness is forcing these political parties to say otherwise. Besides they are also feeling the external pressure. US is openly pressurising these political parties and they are also feeling the pressure of India. These pressures are forcing them to say such things. But we are of the view that even this battle has been won by us. When the eight-point agreement was reached at Baluatar (PM Koirala’s official residence) on June 16, 2006 then it was decided that both the armies and their weapons will be monitored with the cooperation of the UN. Now raising this issue again amounts to going back on the agreement. If these parties retrace back for the agreement then, we feel, people will not bear them. And a single appeal by us will again bring the masses on the streets. That’s why I say that we have won this round too.”

 

awtw

Comments »

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://focus.blogsome.com/2006/08/24/p195/trackback/

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>



Anti-spam measure: please retype the above text into the box provided.



Get free blog up and running in minutes with Blogsome
Theme designed by Riosoft